divider
By Megan Reisig
February 4th, 2010

With the biggest sporting, and advertising, event of the year upon us, now is the time when viewers tune into commercials, especially when there are celebrity spokespeople backing the advertised brands.

But, there is one familiar face that won’t be present, at least for the commercials, during the big game. Although Peyton Manning will be starting for the Colts on Sunday, he won’t be spotted during commercial breaks as he frequently has been in the past. It’s not because he’s no longer one of the biggest names in football and advertising (he is still one of the most used spokespeople in ads), but because the brands he endorses, like MasterCard, Sony, DirecTV, Gatorade and Sprint, have all pulled their Super Bowl advertising spots.

peyton

Does this mean that times are changing for advertising? Are big-name advertisers no longer willing to fork over millions of dollars to run a 30-second spot during the game? Has the explosion of social media caused companies to rethink budgets and reinvest money that was traditionally directed toward advertising to other areas?

Maybe paying big bucks for ads isn’t the way to go anymore. It’s time that marketers strategize and rethink to ensure that marketing dollars are being spent wisely, getting the most bang for the buck and reaching customers.

So, what do you think? Have you seen companies redirecting advertising dollars to other areas? Are you going to miss seeing Peyton in commercials? I know I’ll miss seeing him, but I’ll still be cheering for the Colts during game time!

photo courtesy: www.flickr.com/photos/Leyinglo

divider
By Emily Butler
January 28th, 2010

If there’s one thing that 2010 holds for PR people both B2B and B2C, it’s the opportunity to exercise our latent writing muscles. Our organizations need blog content, podcast and viral video scripts and other forms of self-published digital media content in addition to the time-honored press releases, white papers and press kits.

muscle blog

It’s more important than ever to understand how online audiences communicate about our organizations. This is a cornerstone of SEO. And today, SEO walks hand-in-hand with content development.

More and more, we’re going to see the restructuring of PR departments to house content development. This means PR pros need to understand and use the keywords that have been identified for their organizations’ SEO program. And if the organization doesn’t have an SEO program (yes, this still happens), then PR needs to be ready to lead the charge on this front.

In my mind, there are no better people to deliver clear, concise, “on message” and keyed-in content than PR people. What do you think? Is this where PR is going?

Photo Courtesy:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/notionscapital/ / CC BY 2.0
divider
By Megan Reisig
January 18th, 2010

According to a post I read last week on sfnblog.com, most local news still originates from newspapers. I must admit, with the recent explosion of social media, I was a bit surprised to read this (I confess, I don’t always turn to my local newspaper to get news). However, as someone working in public relations, I was relieved to read it.

I realize that newspapers are shrinking in numbers, size and readership; however, I find it comforting to know that the papers that still exist are publishing fresh news—and news that other communication channels like TV, radio and new media are repurposing and publishing. For PR pros, this means that newspapers are still looking for fresh content!

The post goes on to say, “If the bottom falls out for newspapers, sooner or later, other outlets suffer too.” I don’t agree with this 100 percent but I do think that newspapers are critical to mass media and that if newspapers continue to disappear we’ll see a shift in the type of news that is reported and certainly in the speed of its dissemination.

paper

Do you think local newspapers and their Web sites are still valuable places to get fresh and breaking local news? As a PR professional, are you still targeting and pitching your local newspapers?

Photo courtesy: www.flickr.com/photos/lulupine

divider
By Emily Butler
January 12th, 2010

On SiliconValleyWatcher.com yesterday, Tom Foremski wrote about the “Killer Pitch.” What Foremski sees next is PR pros being able to drive traffic to news stories ourselves. We’d be able to dangle this carrot in front of reporters to make our pitch more enticing.

Foremski says:
“ ‘… and we have the ability to drive a lot of traffic to your story.’ In a world where reporters are increasingly rewarded not on the quality of their work but on how much traffic their stories attract — this becomes the killer pitch.”

Foremski contends that PR pros don’t yet know how to drive traffic to news stories. I agree to some degree.

But, the bigger point goes back to something that we discuss frequently here at B2BFishbowl. Ding, ding, ding – PR is changing.

Today, it’s in PR’s court to drive traffic to our content. It’s no longer enough to hit homeruns with stellar articles. We not only need to place our clients in articles, we need to publish content ourselves, optimize it for online eyes, and promote it directly to our clients’ customers. PR has more jobs to do these days, and content development is making its way higher on the list.

But, one thing remains the same—media bring third-party credibility that we cannot hope to duplicate. So, our pitch strategies must always address what reporters need. If that means helping to increase pageviews for their articles, then that’s an area PR pros will learn to deliver.

Do you think there is an ethical issue with pitching that PR pros can drive traffic to a reporter’s story?

Posted in + +
divider
By Emily Butler
January 8th, 2010

The BCS National Championship game last night was gut-wrenching. Texas fans were on the edge of their seats; waiting to see if the Longhorns could pull through with freshman Garret Gilbert running the show after Colt McCoy hurt his passing shoulder on the Longhorns’ first drive. And while I was on pins and needles throughout the game, it was for a completely different reason. I was waiting for the post-game interview with Colt McCoy.

I like college football—Go Devils—but, in all honesty, my favorite part is what the losing QB says after the game. It’s the most profound moment that really shows what kind of person he is and what type of spokesperson he will be.

Colt McCoy is a class act. He kept his composure, answered the reporters questions, and, most importantly, he congratulated Alabama on its victory, calling them “a tremendous football team”—twice.

 

In contrast, I remember Matt Leinart’s post-game interview after the BCS title game where USC played Texas. Leinart commented that despite the Trojans’ loss to Texas, “I still think we’re a better football team. They just made the plays in the end.” All I can really say about that is TACKY!

There is truly a stark comparison between McCoy’s and Leinart’s interviews. So, what can B2B marketers learn from this? It’s simple: bad-mouthing your competition (even in the most perceivably judicious manner) just won’t make you look good. And, of course, great media training goes a long way.

Kudos to Colt McCoy for getting it right!

What do you think?


blog@canyoncomm.com · 480.775.8880 · www.canyoncomm.com